OBSOLETE OR NECESSARY? 19th OR 21st CENTURY? DRESS CODE FOR SUPREME COURT AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT: TIME FOR REVISION?

Mark 2:27 – Then he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.” Is the building made for the people or the other way around? Read on…

Members of the public visiting the Supreme Court Complex and the Registration Department on White Park Road, St. Michael, are reminded that an antiquated a dress code is in effect.

Persons wearing blouses or dresses without straps; back out or belly out outfits; mini-skirts, halter tops, revealing tops or splits, jeans, shorts, slippers and curlers, will not be admitted into the building. Men are also reminded that they are not allowed to wear ear or body rings and shorts. No small studs or neat bobs? Oh well, guess you won't see near anytime soon? In addition, their shirts must be neatly tucked into their trousers.

Persons wearing blouses or dresses without straps; back out or belly out outfits; mini-skirts, halter tops, revealing tops or splits, jeans, shorts, slippers and curlers, will not be admitted into the building. (Acceptable, but…) Men are also reminded that they are not allowed to wear ear or body rings and shorts. No small studs or neat bobs? To hell with tropical climes. Oh well, guess you won’t see me near anytime soon? In addition, their shirts must be neatly tucked into their trousers.

{HERE IS A TRULY SENSIBLE PARTMINIMISE DISRUPTION} Members of the public are further reminded that all cell phones must be turned off on entering the building.

The public’s cooperation in this matter is expected or else appreciated. (JRB/BGIS)

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Comments

add a comment

Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.