Comments on: Rihanna’s So-Called Interview With Oprah – Talking Chris Brown For The 1st Time: What was NOT there…

By: Gee

Gee — Sat, 15 Sep 2012 15:43:41 +0000

It amazes me that Barbados has rhianna as an ambassador for their Island.
Shes an absolute disgrace and terrible role model to young females.

By: joy

joy — Sun, 26 Aug 2012 21:00:02 +0000

Well said, Oprah is trying, many of us up North find it hard as hell to find that channel…as someone said previously; tired of the Chris Brown questions, ask about it and move on. Seemed to be a PR piece for Sandy Lane and a good PR piece for in spite of Rihanna being a “bad girl” hey she gave her mum a lovely house – nice image work. Hey it’s a celeb intv a puff piece and flim flam from Oprah, thought the intv was too fast, vapid and lacked real hurumph!

By: Stephen

Stephen — Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:06:41 +0000

In these days it’s worrying that everyone knows the location of Robyn’s mother’s new home and obviously where Robyn will be staying in the future. All those of us who have admired it as we’ve passed it (but could never afford to walk in it, let alone buy it) must wonder at a main road location for such high profile people.

Robyn isn’t progressing her Apes Hill land gift, to live in when she’s in Bimshire?

I’ve forgotten where it is already, for anyone who wants to know.

By: jdid

jdid — Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:16:24 +0000

rather disappointing. It was pure PR fluff. Other than Sandy Lane getting some press not much to say about the interview. I do get the inpression from this interview and the ads for next weeks Oprah interview with kelsey Grammer that Oprah wants to be a bit sensational but it just seems like she is going about it a bit half-assed. A bit bored with the Chris Brown questions as well. Some folks seem to think thats the only thing interesting about Rihanna

By: NYC/BGI

NYC/BGI — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 20:11:37 +0000

what a pity that this little girl who has talent has joined the group to Hollywood TMZ seeking notoriety. Unfortunately she has little more than her talent and hopefully she saves her money for the lean years which may happen sooner than she feels.

By: Me

Me — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:37:54 +0000

What makes u think Oprah’s viewers care about local elections? They want to know what’s happening with Chris Brown . As for the necklace and Rihanna’s other antics they don’t make any impact on US viewers either, and all fall into what Oprah calls Rihanna’s being comfortable with her sexuality.

The interview was for an American viewing audience, not for local concerns.

By: Fumble Stewart

Fumble Stewart — Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:06:28 +0000

I made sure to read your editorial and watch the video – so on the ball! Utter crap, Rihanna must have offered to buy shares in Oprah’s network or something, maybe they have goods on her with Gayle or they have goods on Steadman (Just why is she ‘engaged’ so long?)…

The point is, Ian, you don’t bullsh*t (which pisses people off), lots more could have been done with the interview and even the travelogue on Barbados was rather patronising! Barbados is Sandy Lane and Westbury Road? If Rihanna is so human and humane why did she not find somewhere similar to stay? Why go on the West Coast to live like a tourist? That is what you left off – Oprah should have asked are you still truly a poor girl or are you a po’ girl living large?

Maybe she and Oprah were too buzzed on Ri-Ri’s stash of herb?

By: Ian Bourne: Oprah’s Rihanna interview “PR fluff, a travesty” | Barbados Free Press

Tue, 21 Aug 2012 05:14:12 +0000

[...] the Bajan Reporter story Rihanna’s So-Called Interview With Oprah – What was NOT there… Share this:FacebookTwitterDiggMoreStumbleUponRedditPrintEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]